Does New ADA Lawsuit Put Campuses Inside This Issue In No-Win Situation for Suicide Policies? Liberty U. Accused of Clery Violations .Page 19
Over the past few years, schools have
increasingly worried about being sued over a student
Man Sues Accuser for $1.85 Million.Page 21
committing suicide. Now, the other side of the issue
has emerged, with George Washington University
Alcohol Increases Aggression.Page 23
(D.C.) being sued for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act for ousting a student who suffered
treatment,” she told CC. “The last thing we want is a
policy that discourages students from seeking help
So, does this put schools in a no-win situation?
[because they] know there are harms if they seek
No, say legal experts familiar with the issues.
“There are these competing models: (1) we work
Schools should focus on the student’s welfare.
hard to keep the student in school, which students are
“I think there are some things schools can do that
willing to do; and (2) we don’t have the resources,
would be a better response,” she said. “The focus
and liability is great, so we are going to remove
should be on the best interests of the student. It
them,” said Gary Pavela, judicial affairs director at the
should be non-adversarial. It should never be
University of Maryland and author of Questions and
addressed through the disciplinary process. The
Answers on College Student Suicide: A Law and
goal is to have a system that maximizes a student’s
P licy Perspective from College Administration.
opportunity to continue their education and normal
relationships and do whatever is possible to help
Schools should avoid extremes and find the
students get an uninterrupted education.”
middle ground. “College administrators should not
take counsel of their fears about liability,” Pavela
Schools May Provide Protection
told CC. “Their primary focus should be to try to
Pavela suggests keeping students in school
work with students who might be depressed and
may even help them avoid suicide. “Suicide rates
even at risk of suicide and keep them in school.”
among young adults in college are significantly
Best Programs Try Keeping Students in School
lower than young adults not going to college,” he
said. “There may be something protective about the
He notes the University of Illinois has the na-
environment.” For example, he says, firearms are
tion’s preeminent program to deal with students ex-
the most prevalent way for young men to commit
pressing suicidal thoughts. It requires students attend
suicide, but most campuses prohibit firearm
four mandatory counseling sessions while staying in
possession. “So being in school is important.”
school. If a student refuses, then disciplinary action
can be taken. “There is no indication that that
Finally, Pavela notes all the schools concerned
enhances your liability,” he said. “When you see all
about liability for a student committing suicide
the attention to the GW case, the Illinois model not
should look at the law, because it favors schools not
only ethically makes sense, because we are in the
being liable for student suicides. He notes the cases
business of helping students stay in school, but it
that have caused the change in suicide policies, Schi-eszler v. Ferrum College (Va.) and Shin v. Massa-chusetts Institute of Technology, are minor rulings.
Karen Bower, an attorney with the Bazelon
“When you talk about the Shin case and the Ferrum
Center for Mental Health, represents the student su-
case, those are lower courts,” he said. “We have the
ing GW. She agrees that trying to help students stay
Supreme Court of Iowa, in the Jain [v. Iowa, 617
in school is important. “Policies that impose leave
N.W.2d 293] case saying schools are not liable for
send a message to the student that the student has
students who commit suicide. Yet, for some reason
failed, and it discourages the student from seeking
treatment and discourages others from seeking
Business Publishers, Inc. • 2601 University Blvd. W • 2nd Floor • Silver Spring, MD 20902 • Adam P. Goldstein, Publisher • Leonard A. C. Eiserer, Publisher Emeritus Editorial Director: Ami Dodson Editor: Rasheeda Crayton Childress Campus Crime — ISSN 1054-3821 (print); ISSN 1545-4738 (email) published monthly. Subscription rate: $229 per year (print includes shipping). $224 per year
(E-mail delivery). For Canadian subscribers, please add $7.20; for Foreign subscribers, add $9.60. Multiple-year rates available on request. POSTMASTER: Send
address changes to BPI, 2601 University Blvd. W, 2nd Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20902. Editorial: (301) 929-5700; FAX (301) 949-8844. Customer Service: (301) 929-5700, ext. 606 or (800) 274-6737; FAX (301) 949-8855. For fastest service, include account number when you call or write.
To purchase documents flagged call 1-800-274-6737.
43Years of Excellence Reproduction in any form prohibited without the express permission from publisher. Copyright Business Publishers, Inc. 2006 1963 - 2006 Campus Crime March 2006 Suicide(Cont. from p. 17)
“GW University knew or should have known
that this was against the best interests of Nott and
that I can’t fathom, people are more inclined to be
was likely to exacerbate his condition and cause
intimidated by or frightened by or guided by these
him great emotional distress,” the suit says. “GW
[new, lesser] cases rather than look at the Jain case.
University did not act to prevent the possibility of
It doesn’t reflect an adequate understanding of the
suicide, as its actions actually heightened this risk.
way the courts work. One ruling in Massachusetts
Instead, GW University sought only to protect itself
d esn’t change the landscape of our law.”
from adverse publicity or liability should another
Contact: Karen Bower, Bazelon Center for
suicide have occurred on its property.”
Mental Health, (202) 467-5730, www.bazelon.org;
Nott was released from the hospital Nov. 1 and
Gary Pavela, University of Maryland, (301) 314-
his disciplinary hearing was scheduled for Nov. 3.
He asked for an extension, but received no re-
sponse. So, instead of risk being expelled, he agreed
Student Ejected after Depressive Episode
to voluntarily withdraw from the university. Nott
Sues University for ADA Discrimination
was not allowed to return to his dormitory, and had
to rely on his friends and family to pack his things.
Former student Jordan Nott has sued George
Nott was further distraught because he had been
Washington University (D.C.) and its hospital, al-
receiving all his treatment from people affiliated
leging the university violated the Americans with
with GW, so the barring order meant he would have
Disabilities Act by kicking him out for being de-
pressed and the hospital violated his privacy by
Over the next few months, Nott received treat-
ment for his depression in his home town, and took
According to the lawsuit, in April of 2004,
classes at a local university and community college.
Nott and friends stood outside his dorm room door
He applied to other universities and in April 2005,
desperately trying to open it as Nott’s roommate
transferred to the University of Maryland. In May,
committed suicide by jumping out of the window.
Nott petitioned GW to have the barring order lifted.
This scarred Nott and left him depressed. He re-
He described his recovery and included documen-
ceived counseling and prescription medication at
tation from his treating psychiatrist. Nott said: “All
the university’s counseling center. On the night of
I ask is that you remove the bar that prevents me
Oct. 26, Nott felt weird after taking his Zoloft.
from coming to campus so that I may visit from
Because he was alone and he knew Zoloft some-
time to time the lifelong friends I have made there.”
times makes patients more depressed before they
The university responded to Nott’s petition, the
feel better, around 2 a.m. Oct. 27, he went to GW
suit says, with a letter indicating he still had not met
hospital for help. Nott was voluntarily admitted af-
the school’s demands and saying the barring order
ter doctors suggested he stay for evaluation.
does “not prevent you from meeting with your GW
“Within about 12 hours of his hospital admis-
sion, Nott was given a disciplinary letter barring him
The suit seeks to bar the university from continu-
from his dorm [and all university-owned property],”
ing its practices, get Nott’s record cleared, and get un-
the suit says. “Within about 36 hours, GW University
s ecified compensatory and punitive damages.
leveled disciplinary charges against Nott and told
him he had to withdraw from the University or face
The university said it, “by law,” cannot discuss
suspension, expulsion and/or criminal charges, Nott’s case, but offered some general information. merely for seeking help for his depression.”
“In the overwhelming majority of cases, the univer-
sity has been able to provide appropriate assistance
Nott’s Behavior Called Endangering
through existing resources and without the need for
Nott was accused of engaging in “endangering
separation from the university,” the school said in a
behavior,” defined by GW as “behavior of any kind
statement. “When a student in our community pre-
that imperils or jeopardizes the health or safety of
sents a serious threat of suicide, our ultimate goal is
any person or persons is prohibited. This includes
to find support and treatment to get through the crisis
any actions that are endangering to self or others.”
point. While some may see the ultimate goal as to
stay in school, the university’s foremost concern is
The barring and disciplinary hearing notices
for the student’s life. We must also be concerned
were delivered to Nott while he was in the psychiat-
about the protection and safety of the entire commu-
ric ward. One note, the suit alleges, was delivered
nity, which may be impacted by the student’s words
by a university official during non-visiting hours,
even though Nott’s mother, Patricia, who had come
from Syracuse, N.Y., was told that she could not see
Contact: Karen Bower, attorney for Nott, (202)
her son because it was not visiting hours.
467-5730, www.bazelon.org; Tracy Schario, GWU, (202) 994-3566, tschario@gwu.edu.
2006 Business Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quarantine Requirements for the Importation of Frozen Canine Semen (In case of any discrepancy between the English version and the Chinese text of these Requirements, the Chinese text shall govern) Promulgated by Council of Agriculture on March 14, 2007 1. Only the registered veterinary medical institutions/clinics or their agencies can apply for the importation of canine semen. Before the imp
Seligson & Co Phoebus Kvartalsrapport 1 / 2005 andelens Phoebus och jämförelseindex 10.10.2001 - 31.3.2005 (i euro) Avkastning och risk Jämförelseindex 31.12.2004 Kostnader, nyckeltal 1.1.-31.3.2005 Under det första kvartalet sålde jag aktier för 1,4 miljoner euro (knappt 10% av fonden). Volymen motsvarar tre fjärdedelar av alla försäljning