Neuropsychopharmacology (2004) 29, 731–738& 2004 Nature Publishing GroupReversal of Sensorimotor Gating Deficits in Brattleboro Ratsby Acute Administration of Clozapine and a NeurotensinAgonist, but not Haloperidol: a Potential Predictive Model forNovel Antipsychotic EffectsDavid Feifel*,1, Gilia Melendez1 and Paul D Shilling1Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
Tablets-au.com Online ED Drugstore is an 1st. pharmacy providing a personal service to the society in Australia. Over 50,000 extremely satisfied buyers! We're your prescription drug store levitra australia and have provided trusted service to families in Australia for over 15 years.
Pmbcii.psy.cmu.eduAssessment of CNS Serotonergic Responsivity
Stephen B. Manuck, Ph.D.
University of Pittsburgh
Serotonin is an important neurotransmitter and peripherally active substance. Interest
among mind-body scientists has focused primarily on serotonin as a central/brain
neurotransmitter. Psychiatric research has implicated low serotonergic activity in
suicide, depression, and antisocial behavior. Subsequent work in behavioral medicine
has shown low brain serotonergic activity associated with normal variation in aggressive
disposition, hostility, and impulsivity, as well as a number of other important risk factors,
such as low socioeconomic status and components of the metabolic syndrome.
Individual differences in central serotonergic function are ordinarily assessed by: (1)
lumbar puncture, to evaluate CSF 5-HIAA concentrations; or (2) neuroendocrine
responsivity to acutely administered drugs that enhance 5-HT neurotransmission pre-
and/or postsynaptically. Although useful as a measure of presynaptic 5-HT metabolism
in brain, CSF 5-HIAA reflects, in part, preferential derivation from brain regions proximal
to the subarachnoid space and dilution with 5-HIAA from spinal cord itself. Discomfort
and risk from lumbar puncture also limits the utility of CSF 5-HIAA measurements in
large nonpatient samples.
In the case of neuroendocrine challenges, central 5-HT responsivity is inferred from the
relative change (rise) in an “index” hormone following stimulation by pharmacologic
agents that act on 5-HT releasing neurons or neurons expressing 5-HT receptors. Such
drugs may act through a variety of mechanisms, including potentiation of 5-HT
synthesis by tryptophan infusion or administration of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP),
release of 5-HT from storage vesicles and/or inhibition of 5-HT reuptake (e.g.,
fenfluramine, fluoxetine, citalopram), or direct activation of 5-HT receptors. In the latter
regard, although several 5-HT receptor agonists have been employed as
neuroendocrine challenges (e.g., m-chlorophenylpiperazine, ipsapirone, buspirone),
their use presumes that serotonergic influences on a dependent variable of interest are
mediated by one or more known 5-HT receptors. This circumstance does not ordinarily
prevail in initial hypothesis testing or where it is postulated (as in the present
application) that central 5-HT responsivity may covary with diverse endpoints, both
behavioral and biological.
The most widely used neuroendocrine challenge involves administration of fenfluramine
hydrochloride, which both stimulates 5-HT release and impedes reuptake by the
presynaptic neuron. Stimulation of hypothalamic serotonergic receptors, for example,
promotes the pituitary release of PRL into the circulation, even though activity of the
neurohypophysis is complexly regulated by several monoamine neurotransmitters (e.g.,
dopamine). The resulting change in plasma PRL concentration thus provides a relative
index of “net” serotonergic responsivity in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (as believed to
be mediated by 5-HT2A and/or 2C receptors). This interpretation is supported by dose-
dependent PRL responsivity to fenfluramine, by positive correlation between CSF 5- HIAA and fenfluramine-induced PRL response, and by the inhibition of PRL responses via 5-HT receptor blockade (and, in rats, lesioning of the raphe nuclei). Although PRL changes may also reflect, in part, nonserotonergic influences on the secretory capacity of the lactotroph, PRL response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone has been found unrelated to fenfluramine-induced PRL responsivity. The specificity of fenfluramine as a 5-HT challenge is not definitive, however, as d,l-fenfluramine may also have dopaminergic and noradrenergic stimulatory effects, and the l- isomer may increase dopamine availability. In any case, fenfluramine is also no longer available as a practicable challenge, due to its withdrawal from manufacture and NIH restrictions on use. As with other investigators, therefore, we have needed to select an alternative challenge, and for the reasons cited above, have again focused on presynaptically acting agents. Candidates include the 5-HT precursors, tryptophan and 5-HTP, and the SSRI, citalopram. Administration of tryptophan promotes 5-HT synthesis and release. From the 1980's until very recently, tryptophan was not commercially available due to product contamination; hence, tryptophan’s specificity, reproducibility, and safety remain understudied. When administered acutely, 5-HTP also promotes increased 5-HT synthesis and related neuronal activity. However, conversion of 5-HTP to 5-HT is catalyzed by the relatively ubiquitous aromatic amino acid decarboxylase, thus potentially generating 5-HT at non-serotonergic synapses. The use of an oral citalopram challenge to assess CNS 5-HT responsivity may be the best current technique to assess central serotonin. Citalopram (Celexa) is an SSRI and therefore differs from fenfluramine in that it is not also a releasing agent. Nonetheless, acute administration of citalopram induces a significant neuroendocrine response (e.g., PRL, cortisol), and this challenge has notable advantages. Citalopram is the most selective and one of the most potent inhibitors of 5-HT reuptake through its transporter system, and it exhibits no known intrinsic activity at 5-HT or other receptor families. Compared to other SSRIs, citalopram produces a more reliable increase in plasma PRL, and both PRL and cortisol responses to citalopram have been found to differentiate depressed individuals and controls. Pharmacologic evidence and extensive clinical experience indicates that citalopram has fewer side effects than other SSRIs, and is safe in diverse populations. While it might be preferable to administer the drug intravenously, the parenteral formulation has not been approved for use in the U.S. and is not available through the U.S. distributing firm, Forest Pharmaceuticals; in addition, oral citalopram has high bioavailability (≥ 80%). Dr. Kurt Ackerman at our institution found that 40 mg of orally administered citalopram induced a mean PRL rise of 3-3.5 ng/ml over 5 hr in 35 euthymic women (mean age: 37; weight: 69 kg). In our own work we selected a dose of 0.9 mg/kg lean body mass provides the same mean dose that Dr. Ackerman administered. Among 16 subjects studied, the peak PRL response averaged 3.65 ng/ml (i.e., equivalent to fenfluramine under our modified protocol) and varied appreciably among individuals. Side effects (nausea, dizziness, headache) were occasional and tolerable. As importantly, we found a retest reliability (evaluated in 12 subjects) of .66 (p = .02), which is also comparable to our experience with fenfluramine (see Progress Report). More recently, we examined the predictability of the PRL response to citalopram from corresponding PRL change induced by fenfluramine (r= .51, p = .02). This association is notable for the length of interval separating administration of the fenfluramine and citalopram challenges, which averaged 4.5 years. In addition, with Dr. Jay Kaplan from the Bowman Gray School of Medicine, we compared PRL responses evoked by both fenfluramine and citalopram in 20 cynomolgus monkeys; fenfluramine dose was 4 mg/kg IM and citalopram, 3 mg/kg IM. Two timed blood samples were obtained over 1 hr, and unprovoked PRL levels were established by sham injection on an alternate day. The two challenges were administered one month apart. Rank order (Spearman) correlation of PRL responses to the two challenges was 0.52 (p < .02) and nominal classification of animals as “high” or “low” PRL responders by median division of the response distribution on each challenge yielded concordant classification in 80% of animals (i.e., 16 of 20; p < .05). Procedure: Subjects are typically studied in the morning after an overnight fast. Our protocol includes insertion of an intravenous catheter, 30-minute adaptation period, citalopram administration, and sequential blood sampling for PRL and ACTH. Samples are obtained every 60 minutes for 5 hours. Citalopram levels are also determined from blood sampled at 4 hours, the approximate time of peak drug concentration. Blood samples should be placed immediately in an ice bath and centrifuged at 4o C to separate plasma. All samples can then be stored at -70o C until assayed. Subjects remain fasting throughout the challenge.
Rabbit anti-CD163 Cat. No. and Size: 503-3964 : 1 ml rabbit monoclonal antibody purified by protein A/G in PBS/1% BSA buffer pH 7.6 with less than 0.1% sodium azide. 503-3961 : 7.0 ml pre-diluted rabbit monoclonal antibody purified by protein A/G in TBS/1% BSA buffer pH 7.6 with less than 0.1% sodium azide. Intended Use: For research use only. Not for use in